As the only national legal organization focused on advancing equity and protecting the rights of low-income older adults, we are uniquely positioned to drive change through the courts. Our attorneys have a deep understanding of the intricacies of the complex health care and economic security programs that low-income older adults rely on and know when barriers to services violate their rights.
When developing litigation, we partner with advocates on the ground who help us identify and monitor serious systemic issues that impact groups of low-income older adults. We then partner with those on-the-ground advocates and our pro-bono partners from top law firms across the country to file and win cases that bring justice to large groups of plaintiffs.
Throughout our more than 50 year history we have litigated landmark cases that provide sweeping relief to low-income older adults across the country, leading to the return of billions of dollars worth of vital benefits.
People with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) have a right to language assistance services when they visit a health care provider. Yet in the waning days of the Trump Administration, the federal government eliminated protections for LEP individuals in health care.
A federal appeals court ruled that this national class of plaintiffs can appeal to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) when their hospital stay classifications are changed from “inpatient” to “observation status.
The Social Security Administration’s (SSA) failure to timely process appeals causes extremely low-income older adults and adults and children with disabilities who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) to lose all or some of their vital income.
On Inauguration Day, President Trump issued two Executive Orders suspending the United States Refugee Admissions Program and pausing disbursements of foreign development assistance funds. As a result, federal agencies suspended funding for resettlement agencies that assist newly arrived refugees. This assistance includes applying for government programs that provide essential health care, basic economic security, and affordable and appropriate housing. Our amicus brief highlights the unique needs of older adult refugees and how resettlement agencies assist them in accessing essential government programs that promote their independence and ability to thrive in their new communities.
Justice in Aging filed these amicus briefs with the Center for Medicare Advocacy, SAGE, and pro bono counsel Stinson LLP. The briefs urge the Fifth Circuit to consider the discriminatory barriers to accessing health and long-term care transgender older adults will face if the lower courts’ preliminary injunctions stand. The preliminary injunctions bar the inclusion of discrimination on the basis of gender identity as a form of sex discrimination in the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) final rule implementing Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act.
Justice in Aging filed these amicus briefs with the Center for Medicare Advocacy, SAGE, and pro bono counsel Stinson LLP. The briefs urge the Fifth Circuit to consider the discriminatory barriers to accessing health and long-term care transgender older adults will face if the lower courts’ preliminary injunctions stand. The preliminary injunctions bar the inclusion of discrimination on the basis of gender identity as a form of sex discrimination in the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) final rule implementing Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act.
